Vehicle stop for traffic offense results in meth-related arrest
The Lee County Narcotics Task Force reported the arrest of a Keokuk man on a felony drug charge.
Chris-topher A. Matous, 23, 3000 S. Seventh St., was charged with conspiracy to manufacture less than five grams of methamphetamine, a Class C felony. If convicted, Matous could face up to 10 years in a state correctional facility.
The arrest stems from an investigation by the task force into allegations Matous was involved in the manufacture of methamphetamine in the Keokuk area.
He was arrested Thursday following a traffic stop for a driving offense by Keokuk police. Investigators later searched the vehicle and found items that indicated the manufacture of and/or use of methamphetamine.
Task force Commander Dave Hinton said Matous had a knife in his possession. Matous was taken to the Lee County Jail pending an initial court appearance.
ADVERTISEMENT |
The Lee County Sheriff's Office also assisted with the investigation.
Matous is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.
The Lee County Narcotics Task Force is funded in part by the U.S. Department of Justice and funds administered by the Governor's Office of Drug Control Policy.
| Community Calendar | Montrose will keep police department, promote Judd to chief |
Reader Comments
be accurate wrote on Feb 21, 2008 6:57 PM:
be honest wrote on Feb 21, 2008 12:40 PM:
The thing that makes all this most out rages and an immoral act against some members of our society . Police, judges lawyers ,legislators and politicians .Who act so above all these people they are condemning and robbing of their money families and freedom ,rights not to mention making half the country felons which will adversely affect their ability to get jobs later in life .Have done at some time or even are currently doing the same thing . If they aren't currently doing it most have a kid , brother or family member that is .You never heard so much objection until some one brings up drug testing them . Like they have made legitimate for the rest of us .That's completely out of the question and unconstitutional .The FBI now hires people that have used drugs . What qualifications have a bunch of politicians got deciding what drugs a doctor should be able to prescribe ,or the amounts he gives to a patient .Or what drugs anyone else can take for that matter .Doctors have to be afraid to give their patients to many or to strong a drugs with out being charged by the government . That is a crime .Or when someone is terminally ill and cant take anything that eases their condition without being arrested .That is a crime . Its not about public safety like our government would like us to believe . Its about money and stealing . They don't mention when they imprison nonviolent people they make a fortune off them doing slave labor .They tell about the cost of imprisoning people .But you don't hear anything about the off set . I know 3 people in federal prison .1 builds boats for some company 1 builds office furniture for a company and 1 makes things for the defense department . While they get paid a couple dollars a day the prison gets full wages for their work . Lok at the amount of products the department of defense purchased from the department of corrections a year .Private companies cant compete for the contracts as they don't have slaves to do their work .Its all a smoke screen fed to the public for government profit "
SBOB Keokuk wrote on Feb 20, 2008 6:21 PM:
Are you telling us that you sold drugs to a doctor, a lawyer, a police officer, a judge and a priest in Keokuk, IA?
sbob wrote on Feb 11, 2008 3:39 PM:
" well look around! the doctor,lawyer,police officer,judge and yes priest.All so called great members of society by refrence to there occupations.but wow look again.and remember this.ive sold drugs for years.not bragging or saying its right but i've sold to a doctor,lawyer,police officer,judge and yes a priest.but theyre all good people right.maybe it's easier to point fingers at the lower class.then also remember Keokuk is mostly lower income.im not saying drugs are good "
billy wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:41 AM:
ZEN wrote on Feb 14, 2008 2:21 AM:
Mr Matous is soley responsible for himself. I know the Matous family personally and I can reasure you they are good and descent people. I do agree with what you say about using the money to treat the addicton rather than blowing the money of taxpayers to throw someone behind bars only to be let out again without being treated to repeat the addiction. PEOPLE who have murdered get less time than a drug addict or a drug dealer. Whats wrong with this !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Our legal system is also a BIG problem ! I know its corrupt,Wasnt there a local lawyer a few years ago whos name I will not mention, who was caught in a cocaine scandal only to be gone awhile and return only to practice again like nothing ever happened? IT REALLY UPSETS me that it was all swept under the rug like nothing ever happened and he gets away with what he puts others away for!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
new in town wrote on Feb 12, 2008 9:42 PM:
I rest my case!!!!! "
C.J. Parrack wrote on Feb 12, 2008 5:55 PM:
concerned wrote on Feb 12, 2008 1:28 PM:
JJ wrote on Feb 11, 2008 6:07 PM:
Adderall wrote on Feb 11, 2008 3:44 PM:
I just read in the paper where someone was arrested for growing some pot plants. Is pot use a recent phenomenon or has it been around for a long time? Hmmmmm from what I have read on the net, many many people have grown and used marijuana for many many centuries. They dug up some old mongol king from 3000 years ago and found guess what buried beside him??? Wow, and I thought our nation and time was seeing the worst of it but that doesn't seem to be so. Try finding some statistics on number of marijuana related deaths in the USA ( I like the Drug Abuse Warning Network aka. DAWN) for 2006...good luck. Now try the same with alcohol...wow what a difference!. Just for laughs, look up tobacco related deaths....bummer.
Did I read that Heath Ledger died from drug use? What illegal drug killed him? Was it the insidious meth which we all know is the devil's dandruff? Or that horrile hell wee marijuana? Type in "Heath Ledger overdose" and google it. Hey... he died from legal drugs
I wonder if alot of the "knowledge" we have about drugs is based upon scare tactics and misinformation. I'll do some more internet research and get back to you on that one. Right now I got to go to work to pay taxes, a large chunk of which goes for paying for the war on drugs and the war on Iraq...bioth of which may be based upon government misinfomration and scare tactics.
"
sbob wrote on Feb 11, 2008 3:39 PM:
I am impressed.... wrote on Feb 11, 2008 3:12 PM:
I agree with those that say that the "war on drugs" has gone on too long and cost too much. That doesn't mean I think we should legalize all drugs but we can rethink our enforcement-heavy approach and return some common sense to our drugs laws. Maybe our priorities should be elsewhere...like education, and children's health insurance. This may mean that police departments don't get all the funding they THINK they need...oh well.
"
observer wrote on Feb 11, 2008 2:37 PM:
turned sideways when the police pulled up they would have to be so skinny you would probably never see them
If you ask 99 percent of Americans what made this country the greatest nation on earth .They will say freedom and liberty for the people . You can see what what corruption and taking freedom and liberty from the people the last 30 years .Has done to the condition of our country.We went from the freest country to the most imprisoned country. 30 years ago a family could be supported by one member working . Today 2 family members working cant pay the bills and make their house payments .30 years ago people from all countries wanted to come here and be Americans .Now people from most countries would like to come here and destroy it
"
Dave_D wrote on Feb 11, 2008 11:58 AM:
"
pathetic wrote on Feb 11, 2008 2:12 AM:
reader 2 wrote on Feb 10, 2008 1:58 PM:
Our founders on the constitution
"It is a singular anxiety which some people have that we should all think alike. Would the world be more beautiful were all our faces alike? were our tempers, our talents, our tastes, our forms, our wishes, aversions and pursuits cast exactly in the same mould? If no varieties existed in the animal, vegetable or mineral creation, but all moved strictly uniform, catholic and orthodox, what a world of physical and moral monotony would it be!" --Thomas Jefferson to Charles Thomson, 1817. FE 10:76 "I tolerate with the utmost latitude the right of others to differ from me in opinion without imputing to them criminality." --Thomas Jefferson to Abigail Adams, 1804. ME 11:52
No ones saying drug addiction is good . But not every one who does drugs is an addict . In a free society.A person has a constitutional right to do as they please as long as they don't infringe on the rights of others .No one including government has any authority to criminalize freedom and liberty .Any more than if I said no one can read books anymore because they should learn from experience .As people who right books can lie and the person be misinformed . It is forcing your opinions on others or making them criminals .Violations of the oath to defend the constitution by legislators and judges .The sworn oath is now just words of ritual .They have no meaning and to be ignored .This the constitution says is a crime
"
Melody Boatner wrote on Feb 10, 2008 1:52 AM:
Yelsgib wrote on Feb 9, 2008 11:16 PM:
Let's say some kid is born into an abusive family and when he is 13-14 someone offers him some crack. He hasn't had an upbringing which warns him of the dangers so he tries it. He gets addicted (because crack is very addictive) and continues into his 20s. Because he spent all his time in highschool doing crack instead of studying he doesn't have any skills. Therefore he has to steal to get his food and his fix.
To those who have referred to drug users in derogatory terms such as "crackhead," "crankster," etc. Where do you think drug abusers come from? Do you actually think they are evil? Are they demons? Are they the devil?
If they are anything like the theoretical child from a broken family above, what then? Are they still worthy of social/ethical condemnation?
There are two "bad" tendencies here:
First, there is the tendency to conflate "law enforcement" with "morality enforcement." Morality is a difficult subject which I would guess probably 0.0001% of the population has come to terms with/fully understands. It's not as simple as "what I think is right is right, what I think is wrong is wrong." No, in all likelihood, your viewpoint is horribly, HORRIBLY naive. In all likelihood you have very little experience. Please just calm down and stop pointing fingers.
Second, there is a tendency to demonize (as I noted above). There are many problems with this. First, it drops the context - a context which is important in evaluating a person's life. Second, it is generally sexist, racist, and agist - we condemn men who are 30+ years old much more easily than other groups of people. Finally, it alleviates the demonizer from actually thinking about the problem systematically. Let's say that you want to fix the problem of drug abuse (as I do as well). Here are some questions you should probably ask:
1.) What is the psychology of abuse?
2.) What environmental factors can lead to abuse?
3.) Why do individual drug abusers abuse?
None of these questions seem appropriate if we demonize drug users. They are simply "crackheads." Forget the context, forget the environment, forget any hope of loving them, helping them, or understanding him. Crackheads. Demons. Boogeymen. All of these are simply methods for simplifying the world so that we can understand it. Sometimes it's better just to admit "I don't know" or "I don't understand." "
519 wrote on Feb 9, 2008 9:27 PM:
The point is that the stuff is illegal and they know it...If you want to defend the drug abusers or condemn the police for doing their job, feel free, but until you've got to deal with this sort of person screwing up your life on a daily basis you honestly don't have a clue what you are up against....
Legalize meth ???...What a joke...Drug diversion program ???...What do you propose, alcohol treatments ???..haha...
Take responsibilty for your actions, get a job, learn to live a life where putting powder up your nose or in your veins is not top priority... "
Anon User wrote on Feb 9, 2008 6:55 PM:
citizen wrote on Feb 9, 2008 6:36 PM:
"
grolaw wrote on Feb 9, 2008 4:14 PM:
Pretty tough rhetoric. Why will "they do anything?" Perhaps it is because they are attempting to live two lives - a lawful appearing front and a substance using reality. Perchance the social problems with substance use arise from the criminal status of the act?
I remember well the Betty Ford story - her addiction to prescription medications did not make her a criminal (or, Rush Limbaugh) - she became a "force for good" with her rehab clinic. The President's wife was an addict. No crimes committed because she obtained her substances through "legal" channels - albeit that she was Dr. shopping and filling scripts at different pharmacies to cover up the degree of her usage....
Let's turn to the "narcotics task-force" - yet another highly funded aspect of the police power inherent in government. Indeed, with forfeiture laws on the books, these agencies can bring in cash as opposed to just about every other government agency (save the taxing authorities). Why would the police ever admit failure when it would cut the budget?
We have been in a "drug war" ever since Harry J. Anslinger started the war in 1930. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_J._Anslinger
After 78 years, and millions of lives and billions of dollars later, isn't it time to admit that substance use/abuse is a public health issue? Isn't it time to hand the problem over to the physicians and demobilize the troops in the drug war? "
reader wrote on Feb 9, 2008 4:14 PM:
misinformed in regards to punishments . Obop Calls them terrorists and again referes to the robberies and violent crimes
they are commiting .I blieve the average for violent crimes a year in Lee County is 15 or less .I have to agree with
Cowbot. The constitution states it is the supreme law of the land .Judges in every state bound to defend it.Anything to the contrary not withstanding .These things violate the constitution by judges and all the principles it stands for "
boooo! That argument is to be used for weed, not meth or heroin! wrote on Feb 9, 2008 2:29 PM:
The only charges that the meth lab in my little story recieved was for neglect of their 5 children. Their bedrooms were full of auto parts (mufflers, quarter panels, master cylinder, etc).The leading theory among the neighbors about the children was that they had inhaled so much toxic fumes from the manufacturing process of meth for so long that they were in effect, mentally disabled. Maybe if they put daddy into rehab that will make everything better! Oh wait, that's what they gave him...1 year in a minimum security "rehabilitation facility". Yeah, he's clean now, but his 5 kids are absolutely worthless to society and will always be. In case you don't understand the numbers...1 life "saved", 5 lives that probably won't overcome their beginnings.
Get to know some of these poor vicitims of the system by living next to them. I'm assuming you still live in a college dorm if not your parent's basement. Try moving into a nice blue collar neighborhood with some rental property. Eventually a meth lab will move in next door and you too will know the madness of months of sleepless nights. They ruin the lives of everyone around them and deserve punishment. They usually end up getting less than they deserve actually.
"
Crymore wrote on Feb 9, 2008 12:08 PM:
Matt wrote on Feb 9, 2008 12:05 PM:
word... to god's advocate wrote on Feb 9, 2008 11:59 AM:
Anonymous wrote on Feb 9, 2008 11:24 AM:
Hear hear.
I'm a guard at a corrections facility here in Iowa and have been over ten years. We aren't doing a damned thing with these people that society couldn't do much better. These people are sick and sick people do sick things. But it's funny, I've seen sick people get better. It just takes a level of professional care that we haven't the guts to invest in. Not yet. Take a look at how Norway deals with drug addicts.
"
john doe wrote on Feb 9, 2008 11:04 AM:
alex wrote on Feb 9, 2008 10:59 AM:
Alex wrote on Feb 9, 2008 10:58 AM:
and the knife? are we talking about a swiss army or a Dundee Hunting knife? "
Conspiracy Theories.... wrote on Feb 9, 2008 10:58 AM:
So he wasn't actually caught with any meth -- they just think he "might make meth". If he hasn't made any meth yet, how would they know how much he was "conspiring" to make? They probably just found some over the counter cold or allergy medicine on him, since they won't say what the alleged items indicating the manufacture of meth are, but they will say he had a knife.
Since they say you can make meth from cold medicine or allergy pills, I am sure a bottle of the stuff would make a tiny amount -- maybe the .01 grams in the comment above. That would be less than 5 grams. I googled 5 grams and found that 5 grams is exactly what a new nickel weighs. Boogeyman indeed.
So they charged him with a felony drug charge because they think that he *might* have been *planning* to make an amount of meth weighing less than a nickel. And the evidence for this is less worth reporting than the fact that he had a random unspecified knife, possibly like the pocket knife I sometimes have in the car to cut up fruit if I am hungry. "
Obbop wrote on Feb 9, 2008 10:53 AM:
They are a vile foul bunch who can terrorize a town with their anti-social actions.
Crank users commit so many crimes. From theft to robbery to whatever.
Parasites that should be permanently removed. "
cowbot wrote on Feb 9, 2008 10:33 AM:
But lets also reflect on the philosophical and moral lesson of the drug war. It contradicts fundamental tenets of the United States, and of the natural rights of man. You have a natural right to self-ownership. You own your body, and are free to do with it what you will. You have a natural right to property ownership and are free to do with it what you will. You have the right to enter voluntary agreements with your fellow man, such as free trade and interaction. Unless you infringe upon the rights of others - unless you commit theft or fraud or injury - the state has no legitimate business spying on you, interfering with your transactions, or regulating what you can eat, drink or smoke.
Drug prohibition, regulation, and the drug war a-priori deny these fundamental rights to the citizens. They enslave the populace. They tell you that you do NOT have self ownership. They tell you that you do NOT have the right to own certain property. They tell you that you may NOT engage in voluntary transactions unless specifically permitted by the state. They are an anathema. They are corrosive to liberty, prosperity, and the very geneology of societies moral fabric. "
donna wrote on Feb 9, 2008 10:28 AM:
Dr. William Bennett wrote on Feb 9, 2008 9:59 AM:
Another tell-tale is "found items that indicated the manufacture of and/or use of methamphetamine". Have you seen the list? Just about anyone can be charged with this one.
Here's what that includes:
- a pack of matches
- a box of cold medicine
- a jar of starter fluid
- a roll of duct tape
You might also like to know what "an investigation by the task force into allegations Matous was involved in the manufacture of methamphetamine". Almost all the time, these investigations are started because you bought more than a couple boxes of cold medicine in a 6 month period. You didn't think they were making you show id for some other reason did you? "
A-non-user wrote on Feb 9, 2008 9:55 AM:
"
Candy wrote on Feb 8, 2008 9:42 PM:
Terry wrote on Feb 8, 2008 8:21 PM:
police 1....crackheads 0.... "
Me wrote on Feb 8, 2008 7:55 PM:
Boo....the Boogeyman strikes again wrote on Feb 8, 2008 1:55 PM:
A knife...BOO... there's the meth boogeyman again. Of course it could have been completely legal to have the knife since I didn't see where they had charged hm with a weapons offense. The police are trying to scare you. Maybe it was a pocketknife (i carry one of those) or a kitchen knife. BOO...do they report on everyone they arrest and the contents of their pockets....?
How about a drug dversion program for Mr Matous? Maybe we could spend some cash and help the Matous family rather than throw them away. Ths meth thng is out of control and I don't mean its use or manufacture, as bad as it may be. Let's stop the punitive enforcement of draconian laws concerning drugs. Let's recall law enforcement's reckless pursuit of drug offenses and replace them with a more measured response. Let's make sure that police administators quit perpetuating myths and misconceptons. We always hear about the social costs of meth....lets hear about the costs of meth related law enforcement in terms of money, time and lives. Maybe those resources could be better spent elsewhere (schools, housing, heath care). "
| Please log in or create an account by filling out the form on the right. | |


smith wrote on Apr 28, 2008 5:59 PM: